next up previous
Next: A Backwards Compatibility Problem Up: Notes on ``TCP/IP Illustrated'' Previous: Conclusions

Bibliography

1
Balakrishnan,H., Padmanabhan,V., Seshan,S., Stemm,M. & Katz,R. TCP Behavior of a Busy Web Server: Analysis and Improvements. Technical Report UCB/CSD-97-966, August 1997. http://nms.lcs.mit.edu/~ hari/papers/csd-97-966.ps.

2
Bennett,J.C.R., Partridge,C. & Shectman,N., Packet Reordering is not Pathological Network Behavior. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 7 (1999) pp. 789-798.

3
Brakmo,L. & Peterson,L. TCP Vegas: End to End Congestion Avoidance on a Global Internet. IEEE J. Selected Areas in Communication, 13 (1995) pp. 1465-1480. http://www.cs.arizona.edu/xkernel/www/people/brakmo-papers/abstracts.html.

4
Cheswick.W.R. & Bellovin,S.M., Firewalls and Internet Security: Repelling the Wily Hacker. Addison-Wesley, 1994. research.att.com /dist/internet _security/firewall.book/*

5
Crowcroft,J., Wakeman,J., Wang,Z. & Sirovica,D., Is Layering Harmful? IEEE Network 6 (1992) 1 pp. 20-24. The seven missing figures from this appear in issue 2 of the same volume.

6
Kent,C.A. & Mogul,J.C., Fragmentation Considered Harmful. Computer Communications Review 17 (1987) pp. 390-401.

7
Krishnamurthy,B. & Arlitt,M., PRO-COW: Protocol Compliance on the Web. HP Labs Technical Report 1999-99, August 1999. http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/1999/HPL-1999-99.htmlhttp://www.usenix.org/events/usits01/krishnamurthy.html

8
Padhye,J. & Floyd,S., On Inferring TCP Behavior. To appear in Proc. SIGCOMM '01. http://www.aciri.org/tbit/.

9
Padhye, J., Firoiu, V., Towsley, D. & J.Kurose, ``TCP Throughput: A simple model and its empirical validation''. SIGCOMM Symposium on Communications Architectures and Protocols, August 1998.

10
Stallings,W., The New and Improved Internet Protocol. BYTE 21(1996) 9 pp. 55-56.

11
Stone,J. & Partridge,C., When the CRC and TCP Checksum Disagree.Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2000. http://www.acm.org/sigs/sigcomm/sigcomm2000/conf/paper/sigcomm2000-9-1.ps.gz.


James Davenport 2004-03-09